Welcome to ornacle.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cold War/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Cold War
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 1 2 9 14
A-Class article A 5 5
Good article GA 1 4 3 5 14 27
B 3 15 14 8 121 161
C 1 1 2 3 7 14
Start 7 26 15 321 369
Stub 1 13 192 206
List 1 1
Assessed 7 27 47 46 670 797
Unassessed 1 1 1 254 257
Total 8 28 48 46 924 1054

Welcome to the assessment department of the Cold War WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Cold War and related subjects. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Cold War history}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Cold War articles by quality and Category:Cold War articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Cold War WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Cold War history}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Cold War history
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Cold War articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

[edit] Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the Cold War.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cold War/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Cold War
  2. Ho Chi Minh Campaign
  3. Battle of Khe Sanh
  4. Prague Spring
  5. Jack F. Matlock, Jr.
  6. Alois Hudal
  7. Operation Shed Light
  8. Ring of Red
  9. Badaber Uprising
  10. Continental Air Command

[edit] Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

[edit] July 6, 2009

[edit] July 1, 2009

[edit] June 26, 2009

[edit] June 20, 2009

[edit] June 17, 2009

[edit] June 11, 2009

[edit] June 6, 2009

[edit] June 2, 2009

[edit] May 19, 2009

[edit] May 16, 2009

[edit] May 11, 2009

[edit] May 6, 2009

[edit] May 1, 2009

[edit] April 23, 2009

(No changes today)

[edit] April 20, 2009

[edit] April 16, 2009

[edit] April 13, 2009

[edit] April 9, 2009

(No changes today)

[edit] April 6, 2009

[edit] March 31, 2009

[edit] March 28, 2009

[edit] March 24, 2009

[edit] March 20, 2009

[edit] March 8, 2009

[edit] March 4, 2009

[edit] February 16, 2009

[edit] February 12, 2009

[edit] January 31, 2009

[edit] January 24, 2009

[edit] January 15, 2009

[edit] January 10, 2009

[edit] January 6, 2009

[edit] Worklist

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.



Contact with WP Cold War
See also: assessed article categories. Last update: July 6, 2009
Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs