Welcome to ornacle.com on July 6 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:Automatic edit summaries

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] What happened

An edit summary that links to this page via a left-pointing arrow (←) probably was left blank by the user and automatically filled in by the MediaWiki software. In other words, the user did not type the summary. (The manual insertion of such a link is possible but unlikely to occur, although some vandals may fake an automatic edit summary by manually inserting the link to deceive users and make the vandalism remain in place for a longer period of time.)

Typing the summary is unimportant when a user creates a new page; leaving the summary area blank, the edit summary in this case is automatically the entered wikitext, up to the maximum length for this summary: ca. 160 characters, plus "Created page with '" at the start and "...'" at the end.

If the summary describes a redirect or replacement of the content with a {{copyvio}} template, this most likely means that an editor allowed the software to generate the summary out of convenience. If the listed target or replacement text is reasonable, no further action is required.

A summary indicative of an inappropriate edit (such as the blanking or replacement of legitimate content) probably is not a deliberate description on the part of the user (who might not even have realized that he/she was harming Wikipedia).

[edit] What to do

If vandalism (or a well-meaning test requiring reversion) is suspected, please examine the edit to determine its nature and respond accordingly. Remember to assume good faith in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Keep in mind that the edit summary was not typed by the user, so it should not be interpreted as such evidence.

From WP:BLPEDIT: "When an anonymous editor blanks all or part of a biography of a living person, it is important to remember that this may be an attempt by the subject of the article to remove problematic material. If this appears to be the case then such an edit should not be treated as vandalism. Instead, the editor should be welcomed and invited to explain his/her concerns with the article."

[edit] The different automatic edit summaries

Action of the user Auto-generated text Page
Removed all contents of page Blanked the page MediaWiki:Autosumm-blank
Removed all contents of page and replaced with new text Replaced content with 'new text' MediaWiki:Autosumm-replace
Created a new page Created page with 'new text' MediaWiki:Autosumm-new
Created a redirect Redirected page to target MediaWiki:Autoredircomment

[edit] See also

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs