User talk:ST47

[edit] STBotI bug

Can you please fix your bot to stop treating images tagged with the {{Non-free Wikimedia logo}} template as fair-use images? (They belong to the Wikimedia Foundation.) I previously brought the issue to your attention in reference to a message left on my talk page when I updated a sister project icon used on the main page, but the bot just did this (over the course of seven consecutive messages) when I updated all of the sister project icons.

Please also remove my name from User:STBotI/Notified users (as all eight warnings stemmed from this bug).

Thank you. —David Levy 23:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello? —David Levy 21:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Fixed in 0.2.3. ST47 (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but my name has not yet been removed from User:STBotI/Notified users. —David Levy 03:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello? —David Levy 06:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

That page means nothing at all, don't worry about its contents. ST47 (talk) 13:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

When contacting him, you should include diffs or links to archives of your talk page for any warnings that STBotI has placed there. If he finds that the number listed here is incorrect, or that the bot has sent you a warning due to a bug, he will adjust this page accordingly.

You've included that advice since December. I went to the trouble of following the requested procedure, and you refuse to honor your end?

Please don't respond by removing that text and reiterating that I shouldn't care about your list. Just do what you promised the community. Thank you. —David Levy 20:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

The community SHOULDN'T care. That page is long, and I don't feel like loading it. I also am not really in the best of moods to be dealing with whiny users, but I hereby and henceforth give you my permission and blessing to go do it yourself, granted that you agree to stop your strange stalker-esque fixation on that page and on my obviously lacking life. If you'd like to email me a shipping address, I'll have a contract written up, signed in blood, witnessed by an officer of the court, and shipped to you, authorizing you to edit that page. Just stop being petty and irritating over what shouldn't matter to you. ST47 (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

1. I'm behaving in a "stalker-esque" manner by following the procedure that you prescribe? I don't appreciate the above personal attacks.

2. Are you saying that the bot won't reinsert my name with the next data dump? If so, I didn't realize that. —David Levy 21:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Crap. You're actually right. I need to hack together a way to do it without loading that monstrosity in firefox though. ST47 (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed Congratulations, you are now the only user in the list with a value of '0'. ST47 (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Please remove my name entirely. Thank you. —David Levy 21:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I had figured that your continued persistence here wasn't due to any actual needs but rather due to your rather annoying desire to cause as much trouble for other users as you possibly can. A 0 on that page means zero. The bot has never warned you, according to that page. Rather than continue on your merry way like a user with a legitimate concern would, you need to continue making demands and imposing your will upon others. Please cease your trolling. In fact, please do the same as I asked Spitfire to do below. Stop leaving messages on this topic. Anything left here that continues to frustrate me will be ignored or removed. ST47 (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I've replied via e-mail. —David Levy 22:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] CSDWarnBot Warning for pages tagged by users

This annoys me, I'm sure you've put effort into this, but I tag a page, copy the warning, go to the users page, click edit, paste the warning, and save, what do I find? The bot has already warned the user: sure maybe not a bad thing to have a bot doing this job for us. But: I think this is a bad thing because, should the user want to ask someone for help about the tagging of "their" page (as they often do), where do they go? To the bots talkpage? here? But you've already told them NOT to come here, new users generally aren't experinced enough to know to check the page history to see who tagged it, and the bot just makes it hard to find a way to the talkpage of an actual user to help the creator, once the page is deleted, they can't. Cheers Spitfire^Tally-ho! 21:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree. This "warning" system is very annoying. Before I can even place a warning on a user's page you've already gone and auto-posted one. This isn't your place to do so, so soon after the tag has been placed. Many (most?) users on Wikipedia are not script jockeys. They do not utilize tools that automate the process of posting comments when tagging an article for speedy deletion. I would kindly request that you cease and desist from this activity or else find a way to alter the behavior of your bot so that it does not interfere or step on the efforts of other users. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I also agree with Fortis, that maybe it would be a good idea to put a delay on the bot, or just stop it all together, sorry, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 21:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

• Please note a somewhat related discussion at Wikipedia:BON#Problem_bot_.28CSDWarnBot.29. –xeno (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

  can you visit this discussion and let us know where the opt-out is for users receiving messages, or for messages being left on behalf of users, or both? and if it's the former, is it possible for users to opt out of the latter? –xeno (talk) 21:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  The bot does not attempt to determine which user added the CSD tag. ST47 (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  Would it be possible to program the ability for users to opt-out of the bot's watchful eye, i.e. those users that are complaining that it has a tendency to preempt their more personal hand-written notes? –xeno (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  If someone would like to submit a patch to CSDWarnBot.pl which will improve its page creator detection algorithm and add the ability to identify the user who added the tag, for opt-out purposes, then I would certainly commit that patch. I will provide links to the current versions of my scripts in an addendum to this message shortly, once I work out how to upload them. ST47 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  CSDWarnBot v1.0.0 (temporary link) ST47 (talk) 00:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

  By the way, if anyone actually is interested in this enough to go and code a patch, and this isn't (as I suspect it is) just a few users complaining about an isolated issue, then that person may also want to (in a separate patch, if possible) have the bot wait 15 minutes before leaving a message. The bot already only runs every 10-15 minutes, but that apparently isn't enough for some users. ST47 (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

uh, I (and I suspect?) nor Arx Fortis can code that. As this is your bot, please do consider coding that yourself. Please take a look at Wikipedia:BON#Problem_bot_.28CSDWarnBot.29 and leave further comments there, thankyou Spitfire^Tally-ho! 05:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't see the point right now in wasting my time trying to figure out how to do that, and cover edge cases, and deal with people who do stupid things. It's really not something I feel like doing. This is a wiki, though, and if someone would like to step up and make themselves useful, rather than just running about and being annoying, I'm willing to accept their work. I'll reply here, thank you, because it's one less idiotic noticeboard I need to keep track of. ST47 (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

If you've quite finished throwing insults around, you may realise that as you are a bot owner, if a complaint comes up on the Bot owner's noticeboard about one of your bots, you have an obligation to respond, five users have agreed that it would be a good idea to put a delay (or make some other modifications) on the bot from the time that a page is tagged, rather then just doing 15 minutes scans. Please try and stay civil as you explain to me why you can't get on and fix your bot, instead of telling everyone else that its their problem and they should fix it, this is your bot, thus your problem, and thus you need to fix it. Thank you for your time Spitfire^Tally-ho! 14:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Wontfix ST47 (talk) 17:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

This is really simple fix, we both know it. If you are incapable or unwilling of writing a simple time check yourself, the bot needs to be stopped and somebody who can should run it. BJ^Talk 20:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

It really isn't. I don't even know how my current craptastic history parsing works, but it's mostly trial and error that got it as far as it is. I hear that some people have issues with it talking to the wrong user, but I suspect that it's usually a case where there was a pagemove or someone forgot that they edited a page. Date parsing annoys me, and I really don't feel like bothering to go figure out how to do it again. Bot works fine as it is. If a user really intends to add their own message, all they need to do is replace the bot's message. ST47 (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Actually, There are enough complaints to justify one saying it doesn't work fine as it is. Take note of the people around you. Cheers Spitfire^Tally-ho! 20:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I am taking note of them, and I am noting that they don't appear to have a valid point. Please stop leaving messages here, User:Spitfire, you're frustrating me. Future frustration will probably result in me ignoring or removing your messages. ST47 (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 20:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Nathowal, Ludhiana district, Punjab, India

To explain my G7 here, the author created an identical article at Nathowal (which I'm still trying to edit so that it doesn't look so terrible, but anyway), without actually moving it. Since I didn't consider that title to be a particularly plausible redirect or search term, I tagged it as G7. Then the user blanked the page and left a comment that he had "moved" it, but of course he didn't (new account). I can tag it with something else I guess, I just didn't think R3 was appropriate. §FreeRangeFrog 03:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Y Done I have deleted the page - thanks! ST47 (talk) 03:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Sorry if that was a bit weird :) §FreeRangeFrog 03:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Flying Brands

You have just deleted a page I was working on, giving the reason "blatent advertising". I did not create the page, and was fully aware that someone had merely copied and pasted promotional text from the companies website, and, I was in the process of editing that page to fit within the guidelines. Had you looked you would have seen that the page was being worked on just a few hours before you deleted it. You should have left a message for me in the page discussion, rather than delete it. Please communicate with me, before deleting any pages I am working on. Please, undelete the page.Danrok (talk) 13:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:ST47/RFA

Hey. I'm a little confused - it doesn't seem that either Tangotango's or SQL's RfA reports are back up - is there something I am missing as to what has superseded it? — neuro^(talk) 14:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Seconded. :) Verbal chat 14:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Thirded. Is there another centralized template which shows the current requests? Baccyak4H (Yak!) 14:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

If you don't want to run it, could you pass the source to me? I'd be happy to. — neuro^(talk) 13:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:ST47/RFA

I took the liberty of restoring it because (despite your claim that there is "Not much point keeping this around") 100s of people still use it. Kingturtle (talk) 14:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding: User:ST47/AfD

Your subpage has more than 5000 revisions, so no normal admin will be able to delete it. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Mark Blaxill

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Blaxill, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Blaxill. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Edcolins (talk) 20:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] SUPERSWEET deletion

Hello. I was editing the SUPERSWEET entry after months of trying to figure out why it got deleted in the first place. Yesterday I began compiling references for it and doing research on the magazine. Unfortunately, you deleted it before i could complete the edits. Is there somewhere to store the page while I'm working on it? The original page was deleted and I was trying to make it better. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.133.7.142 (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. If you create an account, you gain a number of benefits, including a 'userspace' - a part of the wiki dedicated to your rough drafts and personal notes. While anyone can read and improve this area, it's held to weaker standards than the actual encyclopedia, so you can work on your article there, and only make it an actual article when it's done. Once you've created an account, let me know so I can make a copy of the page you were working on, and I'll give you a link. Then, once you're done, you or any user can help you move it into the encyclopedia. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] update for ARSbot

Could you update User:ARSBot? I was away when we were in process of deciding on a new category name, and it was them implemented. Could ARS pull from Category:Articles tagged for deletion and rescue to do it's work? -- Banjeboi 17:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Oops, I thought I wasn't even supposed to be running that anymore. I've changed the category, and I've also improved the bot's ability to detect the first line of text. ST47 (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

lol. No problem. Why did you think you weren't suppose to run it though? -- Banjeboi 18:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

No idea. ST47 (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Could you check it again? It hasn't seemed to do much in the past coupla days? -- Banjeboi 13:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Odd, it works when I run it manually. I'll try to fix the crontab, it's supposed to run every half hour. ST47 (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Cheers for that, let me know if I can do anything to help. -- Banjeboi 01:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] On another note

I'm looking at a new bot function that would post a "So you tagged an article for rescue" - type tag to those who added {{rescue}}. Is this a logical/do-able function of this bot or should I look to asking for one? -- Banjeboi 01:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Probably wouldn't be a problem. I'll need to put this on hold for a bit though, as I don't have time to code it at this moment. ST47 (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

This was pre-emptive actually. I'm still figuring out what the new tag should look like and do so no rush at all. -- Banjeboi 20:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] You just approved my trial but I need a change

Unfortunately, it appears I should have requested fully automatic mode for the trial for my bot. Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/MandelBot. Thanks for approving it in manual mode. I have made changes to the request to reflect this change and as such it is not the request you approved, so I consider it unapproved and waiting someone's consideration. Is there some template I should put back on the page to indicate this? Thanks -J JMesserly (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Film screenshot fur

Your bot seems not to recognize the above as a valid FUR. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:STBotI.2C a bot against fair use. best, –xeno (talk) 15:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Y Done ST47 (talk) 01:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. –xeno (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:ARSBot

As you know, User:ARSBot adds articles tagged for rescue {{rescue}} to the talk page of WP:ARS, the problem is that these entries are never removed. For example, there are 86 articles listed now, but only 33 articles which actually have the template currently. Is there anyway the bot can also remove sections for a talk page when {{rescue}} is removed from the pages? Ikip (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Y Done ST47 (talk) 01:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Revisit to ARSBot

Actually I have been manually removing items so "these entries are never removed" is mistaken. If the bot is to be utilized in this way then we have a subpage at Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/Current articles subpage where removed from currently listed articles can be moved. They should not be deleted or auto-archived as this list is the only record we have of most of our work. -- Banjeboi 02:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I believe I have implemented this correctly, please review the latest contribs. ST47 (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the cross-purposes posts here but thank you for tweaking this. It seems to be working fine. -- Banjeboi 02:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you ben and ST47. Wow: Wikipedia:Article_Rescue_Squadron/Current_articles_subpage that is awesome. Is the coding for this public, I would love to see the coding for this bot. Thanks St47. Ikip (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		This Barnstar is awarded to St47, for his brilliant technical work on wikipedia. Your work is a real asset to wikipedia, thank you. Ikip (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of castellers de Vilafranca

Hi ST47!

I have just seen that you have deleted the article about Castellers de Vilafranca. My name is Pere Sola Claver and I am member of the council of Intrernational relation fo this association. I can prove it by visiting this link : http://www.castellersdevilafranca.cat/index.asp?carpeta=presentacio&web=consells&tipus=htm&m=1 .

The set of artciles in Wikipedia was an idea from me. We have now translated the catalan article in several languages, among which english. Once thsia rtcile was done, we took teh decision to integrate the text of the artcile in the website of the association. so it is not a copyright infraction but the other way round !!!! In any case, we castellers de Vilafranca have the copyright of what we write in the artciel and the photos. I understand your concerns but I would like in teh future you consult us first before deleting the article. can you put back the article please ? Or let us know if you have any comments. Thanks in advance !

94.42.104.97 (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Pere Solà Claver94.42.104.97 (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC) (user Castellersvilafranca in Wikipedia)

[edit] Deletion of article Castellers de Vilafranca

(sorry, I was not logged in the previous message)

Hi ST47! I have just seen that you have deleted the article about Castellers de Vilafranca. My name is Pere Sola Claver and I am member of the council of Intrernational relation fo this association. I can prove it by visiting this link : http://www.castellersdevilafranca.cat/index.asp?carpeta=presentacio&web=consells&tipus=htm&m=1 . The set of artciles in Wikipedia was an idea from me. We have now translated the catalan article in several languages, among which english. Once thsia rtcile was done, we took teh decision to integrate the text of the artcile in the website of the association. so it is not a copyright infraction but the other way round !!!! In any case, we castellers de Vilafranca have the copyright of what we write in the artciel and the photos. I understand your concerns but I would like in teh future you consult us first before deleting the article. can you put back the article please ? Or let us know if you have any comments. Thanks in advance !

Castellersvilafranca (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Changing t-ball to tennis

Hi, saw this edit on my watchlist and thought I should follow up. Robot-assisted disambiguation of "t-ball" to "tennis" is incorrect. As you can see at the disambiguation page, T Ball can mean three different things, and in this case, I assume it meant Tee Ball. I've never heard of t-ball meaning tennis and Australians don't play tetherball, so tee ball is the only logical disambiguation for the term in an Australian article. Thanks, Somno (talk) 02:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

And this one is at a baseball field, so it's probably also tee ball. Regards, Somno (talk) 02:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Unwarranted warning

I received a message regarding copyrighted content http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BAS_logo.jpg I've uploaded a file with a very similar file name, which is a completely different picture. The one your bot detected as infringing has nothing to do with my upload and it's a completely different image.

---Cantaloupe2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cantaloupe2 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

That message is from LAST YEAR. It was correct when the message was posted. The image has long since been deleted. ST47 (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/CSDWarnBot/2.2.1

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/CSDWarnBot/2.2.1 needs to be logged in! 24.0.68.110 (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Possible STBotI bug?

I pinged you on IRC, but I don't think you were there. I'm not sure how it happened, but I thought I'd let you know about this edit, which was clearly in error. When checking the bot's contributions, I also noticed this double warn and this five times warn. J Milburn (talk) 10:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I fixed the first issue, but didn't tell you because I got caught up in trying to debug the other one. I believe I patched it, but I'm still looking to see if I got all the bugs out. ST47 (talk) 23:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For your amazing Ocean County College images. Thanks! MBisanz talk 23:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to you too! ST47 (talk) 23:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Minnesota Historical Society images

Mnhs (talk · contribs), a representative of the Minnesota Historical Society, has been uploading images that the Society has copyrighted. They have been tagging these images with {{Non-free Minnesota Historical Society image}} and citing a fair-use rationale in each article for which they are uploading the images. Meanwhile, STBotI has been tagging these images and saying that they're potential copyright violations.

I left a question at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Minnesota Historical Society images about this. I'm also asking you because I'm wondering if the code for STBotI specifically looks for a fair use template and a cited article, and if it just doesn't recognize {{Non-free Minnesota Historical Society image}}. Based on the way I'm reading their disclaimer and their responses at User talk:Mnhs, it seems like they're applying the tag correctly and that they are indeed uploading their images correctly. Let me know if this is a fix to the bot or a more complicated issue that needs to be discussed elsewhere. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 22:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Looks like I wasn't expecting the copyright tag itself to take up more than one line. I've updated the tagging rule. ST47 (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

And released image tester version 0.2.6 with the updated code and a new test to make sure this bug doesn't come back. ST47 (talk) 23:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks for fixing this. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 23:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:BAGBot and minor edits on UT pages

Please have User:BAGBot not mark its edits as minor when leaving messages on user talk pages. When the bot flag is combined with the minor flag, it suppresses the nice orange bar. –xeno (talk) 18:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Bump. –xeno ^talk 12:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Surely this can't be a tough fix? –xeno ^talk 19:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing that. best, –xeno ^talk 19:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Bot request

Hello Saint 47 (as I like to think of you). So... remember Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 11? You still interested? – Quadell ^(talk) 23:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Um - are you looking for me to do something about that BRFA, or actually write a bot to perform that task? ST47 (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I appear to be confused. Um... maybe I meant a different botreq. I'll look into it. Until then, ignore me. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, you were the trial approver, not the approvee. Mystery solved! Final verdict: nevermind. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] FT Wikicup scoring

YOu gave me 10 points for my Featured Topic, but it should be 50 because the instructions clearly say "10 points per article in topic" and my topic has 5 articles. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Because the instructions clearly state that you should list each individual article in the topic, as well as the topic itself, to gain credit. The bot is, sadly, not sentient. ST47 (talk) 02:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I lol'd. Sorry for the confusion Rlevse.  GARDEN  09:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah so, ok I'll go fix it. Dumb me never saw the instructions -;) — Rlevse • Talk • 10:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

That's OK, I never realized that we actually had instructions either. Some clever person must have read my mind and figured out what the bot expected, and actually written it down. ST47 (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] About and ...

Hi there. Your bot sent me and did not have a license. I forgot to add one, and was forced to add a license template to both of them to prevent those missing colors being deleted. Toothy7465 (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of User talk:128.252.121.153

A tag has been placed on User talk:128.252.121.153, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: G8: the only content is a speedy-deletion warning for a long-deleted page.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User talk:128.252.121.153|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 128.252.121.153 (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipages in need

Wikipedia is strictly buisness (mostly) so I am sending you this message for Wikipages in need.

Plain White T's, Edward Wong, David Turnbull, Columbia Revolt, Year of the Lash and Jheri Curls Have improved, but still needs a lot of help. --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    16:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

PHASE 2  Thomas Latimer   Matt Bai are better articles now.

-Stubs-

David Garrow

Nell Irvin Painter

Hans Raastad-- an article I created

Pea enation mosaic virus The Grays (band) Gingivectomy Michael Curtis Tom Karsch This stub is getting better, but needs more work. Professor Mike Donovan --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    16:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Spread the word!--RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    14:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
--RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    00:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I dodn't mean for it to be spam, I have just sent this message to lots of people before, adding and subtracting and revising it and I don't really care about all the dates there, but apparently you do. You are the first user (other than me) to suggest it was spam. once I apologised to a user in advance if it was spam, and he said don't worry bout it Sorry! --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    23:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/BAGBota/2.2.1

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/BAGBota/2.2.1 needs to be logged in! 24.0.68.110 (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:STBotI error

It looks like STBotI has a minor error when it reports fair use disputes. See its edit to User talk:StutterTalk. It's adding an extra "}" to the heading. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Whoops! Looks like I was a little overzealous with the } key! I'll go check it out on my laptop and see where the issue is. ST47 (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Issue was in a template, fixed here. ST47 (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:ST47/notagr again

Following up to this conversation, it seems a number of the older taggings using User:ST47/notagr (like File:Sausman cross 09.jpg, File:Max keiser on a london bus.jpg) were put into red-linked categories like Category:Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status as of 12 January 2009. I think there was a switch in the category naming sometime and the bot may have missed that. You can see from the category tracker that a number of old images are in some weird limbo. Would you mind just going through and tagging them again, resetting the clock so to speak? That or a F4 CSD tag. I think that should take care of them. Thanks. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Re-tagging of images is in work. ST47 (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. MiszaBot should be busy removing a lot of lines from the tracker next time around. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Interested in creating another bot?

I know you were involved in making the User:ARSBot would you be interested in:

• Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Possible_for_bot_to_notify_creator_and_contributors_of_AfD.3F

I will watch your talk page and have watched the bot request talk page. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

If you are not interested, do you know any tech savy editors who would be able to reinvent the wheel and create a bot which contacts the creator of an Afd? I say "reinvent the wheel" because one editor already created this bot and had it approved already:

• Possible for bot to notify creator and contributors of AfD?

Ikip (talk) 08:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] BAGBot

BAGBot looks to be offline. It hasn't updated WP:BAG/Status in over two days. Thanks, The Earwig ^{(Talk | Contributions)} 17:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, it's working now. The Earwig ^{(Talk | Contributions)} 22:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] AIV Report

IP:78.47.79.140 has been reported to AIV for making changes to your user space. Just wanted to give you a heads up in case it is you editing logged out. Hiberniantears (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, how do I remove the tags you mention? I'll gladly do so if I know how.

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/ARSBot/2.2.1

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/ARSBot/2.2.1 needs to be logged in! 68.82.224.172 (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Typo

Hi ST47. I just saw a post from STBotI and noticed a typo. If you look at the post at the bottom of User talk:Kriskodai, you will see a reference to an "image escription page", which I think is probably a typo ;-) [[Sam Korn]] ^(smoddy) 22:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] IRC

I've been trying to ask you some NPBB-related questions on IRC - are you busy? DS (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] ARSbot tweaks

Hi ST47! More tweaks for ARSBot.

1. First off, we have it so when the {{rescue}} tag is removed from an item it is moved from the current article page to the subpage. Sadly there continues to be some edit warring resulting in multiple removing and relisting the XfD discussion. As a solution can we make it so this listing is moved to the subpage when the XfD discussion is closed/archived instead - I think this will lessen the disruption overall.

2. Secondly, tagged items are presented in the order they have the rescue tag added to them. Instead I think it would be more helpful to list them chronologically by the date they are sent to XfD. In theory this would move items that have less time before the close of discussion towards the top of the list. Obviously this won't be foolproof as not every discussion is exactly seven days but in general I think this will help pre-organize some of the work. We would then add a subsection for each date and sort each listing under the XfD created date. It may make sense to add a line of text for each listing - Nominated for deletion discussion May 5, 2009. or similar.

Are these do-able? As always thanks in advance and let me know what help I can offer to assist. -- Banjeboi 23:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

• Any update? Also ARSBot has been removing one multiple AfD prematurely. This wasn't an issue before - what's up. -- Banjeboi 18:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Galactus Edit War Mediation

Hi. I'm trying to mediate an edit war over the Galactus article here. Can you chime in with your two cents? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:PPGtest

Umm thats a test account of mine. Please notify the next time you take action on it. Cheers,¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Robot status for your robot at svwiki_p

Hello! The bot status for your bot sv:User:STBot at the swedish Wikipedia has been revoked due to inactivity. This is for security reasons. If/when you activate your bot again, please drop a note to anyone of our bureaucrats or at Wikipedia:Robotansökan and the robot status will be restored. --MagnusA (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] ARSBot improvement request

[1] could have a more descriptive edit summary. If not too time consuming, could you add a clarification like "Adding or removing one or more recently listed articles - Added 0 Removed 2?" I hate to beg work that I could probably do myself, and feel free to say "no, too hard," but it would be really useful. Thanks for any efforts! If you don't have the time, is the source available, and I could just send you a patch? Hipocrite (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with ST47/2.2.0

ST47/2.2.0 needs to be logged in! 92.10.66.227 (talk) 12:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] WikiCup

If you could come into the WikiCup channel tonight or tomorrow, I'd like to update you with WikiCup information for round 3.  iMatthew :  Chat  23:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

On a related note, if you're about before 23:59 UTC, can you please update the final scores manually (if you can?) Thanks. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 22:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll need to talk to you on IRC again, if you are around.  iMatthew :  Chat  22:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Err, cutting it close here. Round is supposed to end in 15 minutes. :(  iMatthew :  Chat  23:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] WikiCup bot malfunction

For some reason your bot has given everyone a bunch of featured credits and other funnies, and may have removed Mitchazenia from Pool A. Please could you try to remedy this, thanks! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Mitchazenia has returned but with the featured credits bug again. Sorry to bug you. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 08:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I mentioned that on IRC, but apparently no one listened. Will go fix it. ST47 (talk) 02:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Apparently iMatthew fixed that a few hours ago. Yay :) ST47 (talk) 02:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] ARSbot help?

Do you think you may have some time for some tweaks? -- Banjeboi 06:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/BAGBota/2.2.2

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/BAGBota/2.2.2 needs to be logged in! 69.242.11.169 (talk) 02:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/AfDBot/2.2.2

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/AfDBot/2.2.2 needs to be logged in! 69.242.11.169 (talk) 02:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/CSDWarnBot/2.2.2

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/CSDWarnBot/2.2.2 needs to be logged in! 69.242.11.169 (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] The deleted Angola Horror page

Hello. I wanted to submit a message because I needed help with something. According to the deletion log on the page "The Angola Horror", it mentions you deleted it due to a copyvio. I'm interested in doing a new article on the wreck (if this is what the previous article was), and I wished to know, if it isn't too much trouble: what got the article canned and what source(s) were involved in the copyvio? Thanks! Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/ARSBot/2.2.2

Bot/WP/EN/ST47/ARSBot/2.2.2 needs to be logged in! 69.242.11.169 (talk) 22:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)