User talk:furrykef
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
|---|
| /Archive 1. /Archive 2 |
i swear to god i meant to put it in the summary, but my dog had to go out, so i got up, i let her out, and then i saved and forgot... I'LL EXPLAIN HERE THOUGH!!! well, i have sent several letters to nintendo (e-mail) and they are all including starfox 2 questions... every time i get a reply it goes something like:
we have no plans to release a new f-zero, game & watch (gallery), or kid icarus game in the near future.
THEY ALWAYS DODGE MY QUESTIONS ABOUT STARFOX 2. plus, after hearing from that guy (or girl, whatever) on the talk page, i was so shook up i went to some forums and they were all suggesting such things like that of the game being released.
compromise: ive sent a letter to nintendo (this time SPECIFICALLY about starfox 2 and only that game), if they reply back saying maybe (or better), it goes back up, but until then, we leave it w/o a rumor. deal? Hollywoodd 08:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but that is not good enough. Statements need to have reliable sources; message board posts are not reliable sources (anybody could write them), nor are e-mails (it's very easy to fake e-mails, so they cannot be considered reliable). If there are rumors, you need to substantiate them using reliable sources. - furrykef (Talk at me) 08:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] O________o
hey! how come you removed "knuckio" from the somari page? it's related to sonic bros! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angus Nitro (talk • contribs) 03:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Because the page isn't about Sonic Bros., it's about Somari. It's basically another ROM hack with a graphics change; anybody could make that. Somari is special because it's a very advanced ROM hack that just happens to replace Sonic with Mario. If we listed every ROM hack where Mario was replaced with a Sonic character or vice versa, the article would probably get really long. - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge proposal
Please see WT:Only_make_links_that_are_relevant_to_the_context#Break 1 for the current discussion. I'm letting everyone know who has a comment on the relevant talk pages. Obviously, we're not going to push anything through without a full discussion of every issue, including whether to merge at all. My sense is that there's wide agreement on all the big points, but the devil is in the details. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 19:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikia Gaming
Hello,
A discussion regarding inactive sysops and bureaucrats on Wikia Gaming was started, I'm leaving this message as a courtesy to allow you to comment. Your logs indicate you have not made a single admin/bureaucrat action (protect, delete, block, user rights) since you were given access. Regards.
--Charitwo (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Recovering deleted pages for wikia gaming
Hi Furrykef can you help me recover these pages and import them to wikia gaming when you have time?
- List of weapons in Resident Evil 4
- List of units in Star Wars: Battlefront II
- List of vehicles in Star Wars: Battlefront II
- USA Story
- GLA Storyline
- China Storyline
- United States of America (C&C: Generals)
- China (C&C: Generals)
- Armoured units of the USA (game)
- Aerial units of the USA (game)
- Aerial units of China (game)
- List of maps in Battlefield 2
- Economy (StarCraft)
- Infantry units of China (game)
- Armoured units of China (C&C: Generals)
- Infantry units of the GLA (game)
- Armoured units of the GLA (game)
- Infantry units of the USA (C&CG)
- Structures of the USA
- Structures of the GLA
- Structures of the Chinese
- Soviet Union (C&C: Red Alert)
- Allies (C&C: Red Alert)
Thanks --Cs california (talk) 04:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply just do some when you have time and I guess you can use<s></s> to cross out the ones you did. --Cs california (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created: List of phrases from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy may be deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.
Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}.
Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
- List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
- You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
- When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. - You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Portal:Portal
- Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Portal. It has not been discussed at undeletion so it shouldn't have been recreated. --Quentin Smith 12:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Can you upload your "Helium article read with helium.ogg" on Commons ?
I am considerably enlarging the :fr:Hélium article from a translation from (English). I stumble on the fact that apparently the file "Helium article read with helium.ogg" has stayed on en:wp. Could you upload it to Commons, so that everybody can use it ?
Thanks in advance Trassiorf (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- It was just that I thougt to see on the History page that it was you who put it on the page. I'll try to see where I can find this file. Sorry for the disturbance, and thanks all the same. Trassiorf (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Lupin III Good Article Reassessment
As a major contributor to Lupin III, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Lupin III/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

