User talk:Falcorian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
|---|
|
|
Write a new message. I will reply on this page, under your post, and probably also make a copy onto your page of the whole discussion just to keep all replies together while still letting you know I have replied to your comment.
Contents |
[edit] Arabani
You know, you've got have some reason for liking Star Wars. You can't just pass it off as "I just like it". Oh, and damn right RP servers suck! And, uh, thanks for reminding me to put a movie section on my own page! --Arabani 01:12, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Bullet cluster
- Note: Please also see User_talk:Mac_Davis for full conversation.
Thanks for checking, the pdf is a record of a presentation at a 2005 symposium about the data by Chandra, who's website is http://chandra.harvard.edu / http://csx.harvard.edu The satellite is owned by NASA, but CXC Harvard operated for NASA by the Smithsonian Institution, according to the site. So the SAO operates it for Harvard, who is taking all the credit of doing it for NASA, who takes all the credit. NASA's site for Chandra seems very small, and they only have one picture of the Bullet cluster. It looks like NASA has a page up just to show that they have a page. http://chandra.nasa.gov I don't know what the rules say about pictures that you took with a shared space telescope, but it seems to me it is NASA-PD— [Mac Davis] (talk)
- Ah, you take care of it. I don't know what to say. — [Mac Davis] (talk) (Desk|Help me improve)
[edit] Warhammer 40,000 Weapons and Equipment
I am not sure how to edit and such on Wikipedia yet, nor am I comfortable doing it to a page I did not create. I saw your name on the article on the headline and was looking to correct an error in it. It says that the Nova Cannon is a large laser weapon, but it is actually a solid munition. This is stated in the BFG rulebook under the entry for the Nova Cannon, IIRC.
[edit] DYK nomination of SN 2002cx
Hello! Your submission of SN 2002cx at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Request for mediation not accepted
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

