Welcome to ornacle.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Comitology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
European Union

This article is part of the series:
Politics and government of
the European Union


Treaties
Rome · Maastricht (Three Pillars)
Amsterdam · Nice · Lisbon
Institutions
Commission (Current)

President José Manuel Barroso


Parliament

President Hans-Gert Pöttering
Members (2004–09)


Council

Presidency: Sweden (Fredrik Reinfeldt)
High Representative · Voting


Other & Future Institutions

Court of Justice · Court of Auditors
Central Bank · European Council

Elections
2004 · 2007 · 2009 · Constituencies
Parties · Parliamentary groups
Outline
Members · Enlargement · Law · Euro
Foreign relations · Bodies · Agencies

Other countries · Atlas
 Politics portal

Comitology in the European Union refers to the committee system which oversees the delegated acts implemented by the European Commission.

Contents

[edit] Overview

All legislatures have a system of delegating detailed implementing measures to the executive. At EU level too, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union can confer such powers on the Commission. In the committees the Commission must act in conjunction with representatives of member states who often have the power to block the Commission and refer the matter to the Council.[1]

It is the confusing number of committees that gave rise to the term "comitology", but the strongest criticism pertained to the fact that the elected European Parliament (EP)had no right to block implementing measures – only the comitology committees could do so, and if they did, the proposal was referred to Council alone, even when the initial delegation of powers was through an act adopted jointly by both Parliament and Council under the co-decision procedure. Parliament argued that the system lacked transparency and democratic control.

After years of complaint by Parliament, a significant reform placing Parliament and Council on an equal footing was reached in June 2006 and ratified by the Council and by the Parliament (Corbett Report) in July of that year.

The EP negotiators, Joseph Daul MEP (chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs) and Richard Corbett MEP (rapporteur of the Constitutional Affairs Committee) bargained with Council for several months, following the initiative taken, at Corbett's behest, by the then UK Council presidency (under a UK Labour government - Corbett is a Labour MEP) in the autummn of 2005, to re-open the subject and seek an agreed solution with the Parliament.

The agreement finally negotiated by Corbett and Daul with the 2006 Austrian Council Presidency gave the European Parliament a right to block individual Commission/comitology decisions, where the nature of the decision is quasi-legislative and where the original legislation was adopted by Parliament and Council under the EU's co-decision procedure.

The system gives Parliament and Council a period (normally of three months) to examine proposals that have been through a comitology committee. If Parliament objects to a proposal then the Commission cannot enact it. Instead, the Commission can either make a new proposal, taking account of the reasons for the objection, (in which case the clock is re-set and Parliament can again block) or it can propose new legislation to Parliament and Council under the legislative co-decision procedure.

The new system (called Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny) applies whenever Council and Parliament, under co-decision on the basic legislation, choose to confer powers on the Commission to adopt implementing measures of general scope that can be described as "quasi-legislative" in nature (delegated legislation). It will not apply to administrative or purely executive decisions. Nor will the system apply when the original legislation is not co-decision legislation. Then, the old comitology procedures (see below) can still apply.

[edit] Comitology Decision

The Parliament had also pressed for more transparency in the comitology system. Already in 1999, it secured the Council's agreement in a Council of the European Union decision June 28, 1999 on procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (1999/468/EC ; OJ L 184/23 of 17.7.1999) ("the Comitology Decision") that references of the documents transmitted be made available to the public (Article 7 paragraph 5). The Commission was therefore obliged to create a register of Comitology documents and a web-based repository to the register which enables the user to get direct access to certain documents which also contains a link for requesting the document, if it is not made public in the repository (in accordance with the rules of the Regulation No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 (OJ L 145/43 of 31.5.2001)).

The register in general contains the following types of documents :

  • agendas of committee meetings,
  • draft implementing measures,
  • summary records of committee meetings,
  • voting results of opinions delivered by a committee.

[edit] Types of committee

There are four categories of committee: Advisory, Management, Regulatory and, under the new procedure agreed in 2006, Regulatory with Scrutiny. Advisory committees give opinions which the Commission must take account of, but it retains the power of decision. Management committees can block a proposed Commission measure by a qualified majority. A Regulatory committee needs a qualified majority to approve a proposed Commission measure. Measures not adopted are referred to the Council for a decision (or Council and Parliament under the new Regulatory committee with Scrutiny, where opposition from either will block the proposed measure).[1]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs