Welcome to ornacle.com on July 12 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Arf invariant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Arf and a formula for the Arf invariant appear on the reverse side of the 2009 Turkish 10 Lira note

In mathematics, the Arf invariant of a nonsingular quadratic form over the 2-element field F2 is the element of F2 that occurs most often among the values of the form. Two nonsingular quadratic forms over F2 are isomorphic if and only if they have the same Arf invariant. The invariant was essentially known to Dickson (1901) and rediscovered by Cahit Arf (1941). It is used in algebraic topology to define the Arf-Kervaire invariant and the Arf invariant of a knot.

Contents

[edit] Structure of quadratic forms over F2

Up to isomorphism, there are two nonsingular 2-dimensional quadratic forms over F2, namely A(x,y) = x2 + xy + y2 and B(x,y) = xy. Here A has three elements of norm 1, and B has one element of norm 1.

Already in 1901 it was known[1] that every nonsingular quadratic form over F2 is isomorphic to an orthogonal sum Am + Bn for some nonnegative integers m and n. Since A + A is isomorphic to B + B, the integers m and n are not uniquely determined by the form, but they are determined modulo 2. The value of m mod 2 is the Arf invariant of the quadratic form.

A quadratic form C of dimension 2k has 22k elements. A non-singular C has 22k−1 + 2k−1 elements of norm 1 if its Arf invariant is 1, and 22k−1 − 2k−1 elements of norm 1 if its Arf invariant is 0. William Browder has called the Arf invariant the democratic invariant[2] because it is the norm of the majority of its elements[3]. Another characterization: C has Arf invariant 0 if and only if the underlying 2k-dimensional vector space over the field F2 has a k-dimensional subspace on which C is identically 0.

The Arf invariant is additive; in other words, the Arf invariant of an orthogonal sum of two quadratic forms is the sum of their Arf invariants.

[edit] The Arf invariant in Topology

Let M be a compact, connected 2k-dimensional manifold with a boundary \partial M such that the induced morphisms in \mathbb{Z}_2-coefficient homology

H_k(M,\partial M;\mathbb{Z}_2) \to H_{k-1}(\partial M;\mathbb{Z}_2), H_k(\partial M;\mathbb{Z}_2) \to H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2)

are both zero (e.g. if M is closed). The intersection form

\lambda\colon H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2)\times H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2)\to \mathbb{Z}_2

is non-singular. (Topologists usually write F2 as \mathbb{Z}_2.) A quadratic refinement for λ is a function \mu \colon H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2) \to \mathbb{Z}_2 which satisfies

\mu(x+y) + \mu(x) + \mu(y) \equiv \lambda(x,y) \pmod 2 \; \forall \,x,y \in H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2)

Let {x,y} be any 2-dimensional subspace of H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2), such that λ(x,y) = 1. Then there are two possibilities. Either all of μ(x + y),μ(x),μ(y) are 1, or else just one of them is 1, and the other two are 0. Call the first case H1,1, and the second case H0,0. Since every form is equivalent to a symplectic form, we can always find subspaces {x,y} with x and y being λ-dual. We can therefore split H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2) into a direct sum of subspaces isomorphic to either H0,0 or H1,1. Furthermore, by a clever change of basis, H^{0,0} \oplus H^{0,0} \cong H^{1,1} \oplus H^{1,1}. We therefore define the Arf invariant

Arf(H_k(M;\mathbb{Z}_2);\mu) = (number of copies of H1,1 in a decomposition Mod 2)  \in \mathbb{Z}_2.

[edit] Examples

  • Let M be a compact, connected, oriented 2-dimensional manifold, i.e. a surface, of genus g such that the boundary \partial M is either empty or is connected. Embed M in Sm, where m \geq 4. Choose a framing of M, that is a trivialization of the normal (m-2)-plane vector bundle. (This is possible for m = 3, so is certainly possible for m \geq 4). Choose a symplectic basis x_1,x_2,\dots,x_{2g-1},x_{2g} for H_1(M)=\mathbb{Z}^{2g}. Each basis element is represented by an embedded circle x_i:S^1 \subset M. The normal (m-1)-plane vector bundle of S^1 \subset M \subset S^m has two trivializations, one determined by a standard framing of a standard embedding S^1 \subset S^m and one determined by the framing of M, which differ by a map S^1 \to SO(m-1) i.e. an element of \pi_1(SO(m-1)) \cong \mathbb{Z}_2 for m \geq 4. This can also be viewed as the framed cobordism class of S1 with this framing in the 1-dimensional framed cobordism group \Omega^{framed}_1 \cong \pi_m(S^{m-1}) \, (m \geq 4) \cong \mathbb{Z}_2, which is generated by the circle S1 with the Lie group framing. The isomorphism here is via the Pontrjagin-Thom construction.) Define \mu(x)\in \mathbb{Z}_2 to be this element. The Arf invariant of the framed surface is now defined
 \Phi(M) = Arf(H_1(M,\partial M;\mathbb{Z}_2);\mu) \in \mathbb{Z}_2

Note that \pi_1(SO(2)) \cong \mathbb{Z}, so we had to stabilise, taking m to be at least 4, in order to get an element of \mathbb{Z}_2. The case m = 3 is also admissible as long as we take the residue modulo 2 of the framing.

  • The Arf invariant Φ(M) of a framed surface detects whether there is a 3-manifold whose boundary is the given surface which extends the given framing. This is because H1,1 does not bound. H1,1 represents a torus T2 with a trivialisation on both generators of H_1(T^2;\mathbb{Z}_2) which twists an odd number of times. The key fact is that up to homotopy there are two choices of trivialisation of a trivial 3-plane bundle over a circle, corresponding to the two elements of π1(SO(3)). An odd number of twists, known as the Lie group framing, does not extend across a disc, whilst an even number of twists does. (Note that this corresponds to putting a spin structure on our surface.) Pontrjagin used the Arf invariant of framed surfaces to compute the 2-dimensional framed cobordism group \Omega^{framed}_2 \cong \pi_m(S^{m-2}) \, (m \geq 4) \cong \mathbb{Z}_2, which is generated by the torus T2 with the Lie group framing. The isomorphism here is via the Pontrjagin-Thom construction.
  • Let (M^2,\partial M) \subset S^3 be a Seifert surface for a knot, \partial M = K \colon S^1 \hookrightarrow S^3, which can be represented as a disc D2 with bands attached. The bands will typically be twisted and knotted. Each band corresponds to a generator x \in H_1(M;\mathbb{Z}_2). x can be represented by a circle which traverses one of the bands. Define μ(x) to be the number of full twists in the band modulo 2. Suppose we let S3 bound D4, and push the Seifert surface M into D4, so that its boundary still resides in S3. Around any generator x \in H_1(M,\partial M), we now have a trivial normal 3-plane vector bundle. Trivialise it using the trivial framing of the normal bundle to the embedding M \hookrightarrow D^4 for 2 of the sections required. For the third, choose a section which remains normal to x, whilst always remaining tangent to M. This trivialisation again determines an element of π1(SO(3)), which we take to be μ(x). Note that this coincides with the previous definition of μ.
  • The intersection form on the 2k+1-dimensional \mathbb{Z}_2-coefficient homology H_{2k+1}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2) of a framed 4k+2-dimensional manifold M has a quadratic refinement μ, which depends on the framing. For k \neq 0,1,3 and x \in H_{2k+1}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2) represented by an embedding x:S^{2k+1}\subset M the value \mu(x)\in \mathbb{Z}_2 is 0 or 1, according as to the normal bundle of x is trivial or not. The Kervaire invariant of the framed 4k+2-dimensional manifold M is the Arf invariant of the quadratic refinement μ on H_{2k+1}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2). The Kervaire invariant is a homomorphism \pi_{4k+2}^S \to \mathbb{Z}_2 on the 4k+2-dimensional stable homotopy group of spheres. The Kervaire invariant can also be defined for a 4k+2-dimensional manifold M which is framed except at a point.
  • In surgery theory, for any 4k + 2-dimensional normal map (f,b):M \to X there is defined a nonsingular quadratic form (K_{2k+1}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2),\mu) on the \mathbb{Z}_2-coefficient homology kernel
K_{2k+1}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2)=ker(f_*:H_{2k+1}(M;\mathbb{Z}_2)\to H_{2k+1}(X;\mathbb{Z}_2)) refining the homological intersection form λ. The Arf invariant of this form is the Kervaire invariant of (f,b). In the special case X = S4k + 2 this is the Kervaire invariant of M. The Kervaire invariant features in the classification of exotic spheres by Kervaire and Milnor, and more generally in the classification of manifolds by surgery theory. Browder defined μ using functional Steenrod squares, and Wall defined μ using framed immersions. The quadratic enhancement μ(x) crucially provides more information than λ(x,x) : it is possible to kill x by surgery if and only if μ(x) = 0. The corresponding Kervaire invariant detects the surgery obstruction of (f,b) in L_{4k+2}(\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}_2.

[edit] See also

  • See Lickorish(1997) for the relation between the Arf invariant and the Jones polynomial.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Dickson, Chapter VIII.
  2. ^ Martino and Priddy, p.61
  3. ^ Browder, Proposition III.1.8

[edit] References

  • Arf, Cahit (1941), "Untersuchungen über quadratische Formen in Körpern der Charakteristik 2, I", J. Reine Angew. Math 183: 148–167 
  • L. Pontrjagin, Smooth manifolds and their applications in homotopy theory American Mathematical Society Translations, Ser. 2, Vol. 11, pp. 1–114 (1959)
Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs