Arf invariant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, the Arf invariant of a nonsingular quadratic form over the 2-element field F2 is the element of F2 that occurs most often among the values of the form. Two nonsingular quadratic forms over F2 are isomorphic if and only if they have the same Arf invariant. The invariant was essentially known to Dickson (1901) and rediscovered by Cahit Arf (1941). It is used in algebraic topology to define the Arf-Kervaire invariant and the Arf invariant of a knot.
Contents |
[edit] Structure of quadratic forms over F2
Up to isomorphism, there are two nonsingular 2-dimensional quadratic forms over F2, namely A(x,y) = x2 + xy + y2 and B(x,y) = xy. Here A has three elements of norm 1, and B has one element of norm 1.
Already in 1901 it was known[1] that every nonsingular quadratic form over F2 is isomorphic to an orthogonal sum Am + Bn for some nonnegative integers m and n. Since A + A is isomorphic to B + B, the integers m and n are not uniquely determined by the form, but they are determined modulo 2. The value of m mod 2 is the Arf invariant of the quadratic form.
A quadratic form C of dimension 2k has 22k elements. A non-singular C has 22k−1 + 2k−1 elements of norm 1 if its Arf invariant is 1, and 22k−1 − 2k−1 elements of norm 1 if its Arf invariant is 0. William Browder has called the Arf invariant the democratic invariant[2] because it is the norm of the majority of its elements[3]. Another characterization: C has Arf invariant 0 if and only if the underlying 2k-dimensional vector space over the field F2 has a k-dimensional subspace on which C is identically 0.
The Arf invariant is additive; in other words, the Arf invariant of an orthogonal sum of two quadratic forms is the sum of their Arf invariants.
[edit] The Arf invariant in Topology
Let M be a compact, connected 2k-dimensional manifold with a boundary
such that the induced morphisms in
-coefficient homology
, 
are both zero (e.g. if M is closed). The intersection form
is non-singular. (Topologists usually write F2 as
.) A quadratic refinement for λ is a function
which satisfies
Let {x,y} be any 2-dimensional subspace of
, such that λ(x,y) = 1. Then there are two possibilities. Either all of μ(x + y),μ(x),μ(y) are 1, or else just one of them is 1, and the other two are 0. Call the first case H1,1, and the second case H0,0. Since every form is equivalent to a symplectic form, we can always find subspaces {x,y} with x and y being λ-dual. We can therefore split
into a direct sum of subspaces isomorphic to either H0,0 or H1,1. Furthermore, by a clever change of basis,
. We therefore define the Arf invariant
= (number of copies of H1,1 in a decomposition Mod 2)
.
[edit] Examples
- Let M be a compact, connected, oriented 2-dimensional manifold, i.e. a surface, of genus g such that the boundary
is either empty or is connected. Embed M in Sm, where
. Choose a framing of M, that is a trivialization of the normal (m-2)-plane vector bundle. (This is possible for m = 3, so is certainly possible for
). Choose a symplectic basis
for
. Each basis element is represented by an embedded circle
. The normal (m-1)-plane vector bundle of
has two trivializations, one determined by a standard framing of a standard embedding
and one determined by the framing of M, which differ by a map
i.e. an element of
for
. This can also be viewed as the framed cobordism class of S1 with this framing in the 1-dimensional framed cobordism group
, which is generated by the circle S1 with the Lie group framing. The isomorphism here is via the Pontrjagin-Thom construction.) Define
to be this element. The Arf invariant of the framed surface is now defined
Note that
, so we had to stabilise, taking m to be at least 4, in order to get an element of
. The case m = 3 is also admissible as long as we take the residue modulo 2 of the framing.
- The Arf invariant Φ(M) of a framed surface detects whether there is a 3-manifold whose boundary is the given surface which extends the given framing. This is because H1,1 does not bound. H1,1 represents a torus T2 with a trivialisation on both generators of
which twists an odd number of times. The key fact is that up to homotopy there are two choices of trivialisation of a trivial 3-plane bundle over a circle, corresponding to the two elements of π1(SO(3)). An odd number of twists, known as the Lie group framing, does not extend across a disc, whilst an even number of twists does. (Note that this corresponds to putting a spin structure on our surface.) Pontrjagin used the Arf invariant of framed surfaces to compute the 2-dimensional framed cobordism group
, which is generated by the torus T2 with the Lie group framing. The isomorphism here is via the Pontrjagin-Thom construction.
- Let
be a Seifert surface for a knot,
, which can be represented as a disc D2 with bands attached. The bands will typically be twisted and knotted. Each band corresponds to a generator
. x can be represented by a circle which traverses one of the bands. Define μ(x) to be the number of full twists in the band modulo 2. Suppose we let S3 bound D4, and push the Seifert surface M into D4, so that its boundary still resides in S3. Around any generator
, we now have a trivial normal 3-plane vector bundle. Trivialise it using the trivial framing of the normal bundle to the embedding
for 2 of the sections required. For the third, choose a section which remains normal to x, whilst always remaining tangent to M. This trivialisation again determines an element of π1(SO(3)), which we take to be μ(x). Note that this coincides with the previous definition of μ.
- The Arf invariant of a knot is defined via its Seifert surface. It is independent of the choice of Seifert surface (The basic surgery change of S-equivalence, adding/removing a tube, adds/deletes a H0,0 direct summand), and so is a knot invariant. It is additive under connected sum, and vanishes on slice knots, so is a knot concordance invariant.
- The intersection form on the 2k+1-dimensional
-coefficient homology
of a framed 4k+2-dimensional manifold M has a quadratic refinement μ, which depends on the framing. For
and
represented by an embedding
the value
is 0 or 1, according as to the normal bundle of x is trivial or not. The Kervaire invariant of the framed 4k+2-dimensional manifold M is the Arf invariant of the quadratic refinement μ on
. The Kervaire invariant is a homomorphism
on the 4k+2-dimensional stable homotopy group of spheres. The Kervaire invariant can also be defined for a 4k+2-dimensional manifold M which is framed except at a point.
- In surgery theory, for any 4k + 2-dimensional normal map
there is defined a nonsingular quadratic form
on the
-coefficient homology kernel
refining the homological intersection form λ. The Arf invariant of this form is the Kervaire invariant of (f,b). In the special case X = S4k + 2 this is the Kervaire invariant of M. The Kervaire invariant features in the classification of exotic spheres by Kervaire and Milnor, and more generally in the classification of manifolds by surgery theory. Browder defined μ using functional Steenrod squares, and Wall defined μ using framed immersions. The quadratic enhancement μ(x) crucially provides more information than λ(x,x) : it is possible to kill x by surgery if and only if μ(x) = 0. The corresponding Kervaire invariant detects the surgery obstruction of (f,b) in
.
[edit] See also
- See Lickorish(1997) for the relation between the Arf invariant and the Jones polynomial.
[edit] Notes
[edit] References
- Arf, Cahit (1941), "Untersuchungen über quadratische Formen in Körpern der Charakteristik 2, I", J. Reine Angew. Math 183: 148–167
- Glen Bredon: Topology and Geometry, 1993, ISBN 0-387-97926-3.
- Browder, William (1972), Surgery on simply-connected manifolds, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, MR0358813
- A.V. Chernavskii (2001), "Arf invariant", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1556080104
- Dickson, Leonard Eugene (1901), Linear groups: With an exposition of the Galois field theory, New York: Dover Publications Inc, MR0104735
- Kirby, Robion (1989), The topology of 4-manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1374, Springer-Verlag, doi:, MR1001966, ISBN 0-387-51148-2
- W. B. Raymond Lickorish, An Introduction to Knot Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 1997, ISBN 0-387-98254-X
- Martino, J.; Priddy, S. (2003), "Group Extensions And Automorphism Group Rings", Homology, Homotopy and Applications 5 (1): 53–70, http://arxiv.org/pdf/0711.1536, retrieved on 2009-05-24
- L. Pontrjagin, Smooth manifolds and their applications in homotopy theory American Mathematical Society Translations, Ser. 2, Vol. 11, pp. 1–114 (1959)




